BADR - is there a problem for cash-rich companies?
Your company ceased trading several months back and you’re about to wind it up. The trouble is it has substantial cash investments. Will this affect your entitlement to business asset disposal relief (BADR)?

BADR
Despite the hike in capital gains tax (CGT) rates announced in the 2024 Autumn Budget, business asset disposal relief (BADR) can still save business owners significant sums of tax when they sell or close their businesses. Gains made on or after 6 April 2025, up to £1 million (this is a lifetime limit), are charged at a maximum of 14% (10% before 6 April 2025) compared with 24% where BADR doesn’t apply. However, conditions apply.
Main conditions for share sales
BADR can apply to gains made from the sale of shares, or sums received on winding up in a company if:
- you were an employee or director of the company, or one in the same group
- the company’s (or group’s) main activities are trading and any non-trading activity, such as owning and managing investments, isn’t substantial.
The second of these conditions often raises questions about eligibility for BADR.
Cash in the company
What counts as substantial non-trading activity isn’t explained in the CGT rules. HMRC has a longstanding view that anything more than 20% of a company’s activity is potentially substantial. This is generally accepted but is by no means set in stone and allows room for discussion.
How much is too much?
When measuring the 20% benchmark HMRC considers:
- the level of income from non-trading activity
- the value of non-trade-related assets
- the time and effort devoted to managing the non-trade assets and generating the income from them; and
- the company’s history, i.e. how long the non-trading activities have been present.
The last point is especially important. For example, an actively managed and substantial share portfolio might involve considerable time and effort relative to a company’s overall activities, while simply holding money in one or more interest-bearing accounts would not. So, if the cash investments of a company were of the latter type only they ought not to interfere with BADR even where their value significantly exceeds 20% of a company’s assets.
HMRC’s guidance on this point is helpful and therefore worth reading, as is the judgment in Jacqueline Potter and Neil Potter v HMRC [2019].
Ensuring BADR
If you’re worried about the level of savings and investments in your company preventing BADR from applying to gains you’ll make from selling your shares or winding up the company, it’s worth getting HMRC’s view.
In cases of doubt over BADR you can apply to HMRC for a “non-statutory clearance”. This will indicate HMRC‘s view on whether it applies. Even if it’s negative this will allow you to take steps to rectify the issues preventing BADR from applying.
Related Articles
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
-
How to handle workers aiming to "Slide Away" to an Oasis Concert
The Oasis Live ’25 UK reunion tour starts in Cardiff on 4 July 2025 and concludes in London on 28 September 2025. With ticketless fans keen on obtaining last-minute tickets and ticketed fans eager to get to the gig for when the gates open, this could have an impact on staff productivity and timekeeping. How can you tackle these issues?
-
Is getting your business to pay tax efficient?
You were recently involved in an online discussion about the tax consequences of putting the cost of a celebratory meal for the business owners and staff through the firm’s books. Will doing so save or increase tax overall?